LAWS(CAL)-2016-8-149

AYAN GARAI Vs. GARAI

Decided On August 16, 2016
AYNUDDIN TARAFDAR Appellant
V/S
MAHITALI BIDYA @ ABDUL MAHIT MOLLA And ORS Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This second appeal is directed against the judgement and decree dated 30th July, 2014 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, 5th Court at Barasat, North 24-Parganas in Title Appeal No. 66 of 1997 reversing the judgement and decree dated 28th August, 1996 passed by the Learned Munsif, 2nd Court, Basirhat, North 24-Parganas in Title Suit No. 93 of 1990, at the instance of the plaintiffs/appellants.

(2.) Here is the case where we find that the original plaintiff being the predecessor-in-interest of the appellants herein filed a suit for declaration of his title in respect of the suit property by virtue of his purchase of the suit land from the defendant no.3 viz. Bhola Baidya. The proforma defendants are the substituted heirs of the said Bhola Baidya. He also claimed incidental reliefs in the said suit.

(3.) Admittedly, Bhola Baidya was the owner of the suit property. Both the parties are claiming title through Bhola Baidya. Both the parties are claiming title by virtue of their purchase of the suit land through registered sale deeds both executed by Bhola Baidya. One of such sale deeds was executed in favour of the plaintiff and the other one was executed in favour of the defendant no.1. The deed which was executed by the said Bhola Baidya in favour of the defendant no.1, was earlier in point of time than that of the deed which was executed by the said Bhola Baidya in favour of the plaintiff. The sale deed in favour of the defendant no.1 was executed on 4th May, 1990. The same was registered on 18th May, 1990. The sale deed in favour of the plaintiff was executed on 11th May, 1990 and the same was registered on 15th May, 1990.