LAWS(CAL)-2016-4-53

JOYDEB DUTTA Vs. ATIN LAW

Decided On April 20, 2016
Joydeb Dutta Appellant
V/S
Atin Law Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner has filed the present revisional application assailing the order No. 41 dated 16th April, 2015 passed by the Learned Judge, 10th Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta in Money Suit No. 609 of 2009 thereby rejecting the petitioner's application under Order 26 Rule 10A(1) read with Sec. 151 of the Civil Procedure Code for appointment of handwriting expert.

(2.) The brief case of the petitioner is as follows:

(3.) Mr. Swapan Kumar Mullick, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that just to safe the point of limitation to file the said Money Suit the plaintiff/opposite party has relied on the document whether the veracity of the signature and the contains of the said document has been challenged and disputed by the petitioner therefore, the petitioner/defendant filed that application for appointment of handwriting expert to examine the said disputed signature appeared in the said document.