RAMJAN ALI Vs. TUHIN DANDAPAT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India wherein the present petitioners have assailed the Order No. 97 dated 30th August, 2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Fifth Court at Midnapore, District: Midnapore (West), in L.A. Misc. Case No. 4 of 2002. Vide that impugned order, the learned Trial Court rejected the prayer of these three petitioners to be added in that Misc. Case on the ground that they were interested party so far as that Misc. Case was concerned.

(2.) The fact so relevant for the purpose of determination of this revisional application can be stated in brief thus: -

(3.) Mr. Mahato, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, by taking me to Section 20(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter called as the said Act), submitted that "all persons interested in the objection, except such (if any) of them as have consented without protest to receive payment of compensation awarded are entitled to get notice from the court". He submitted that Section 18 comes up after an application has been made to the Collector raising the voice as regards the amount of compensation in respect of particular land. He submitted that Section 20 says that Court after accepting such an application from the disgruntled land looser shall issue notice to the applicant, as per Section 20(a), and 20(b) to all persons interested in the objection.