SIKANDER RAJAK Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This writ-petitioner under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of an applicant under Section t9 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and is directed against order dated April 17, 2006 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, in Original Application No. 23 of 2005 thereby rejecting the application filed by the petitioner on the ground of want of territorial jurisdiction.

(2.) The case made out by the writ-petitioner in the application under Section 19 of the Act be summarised thus :

(3.) Although the respondent No. 4 moved to Hazipur pursuant to the order of transfer dated February 28, 2004, he did not take the writ-petitioner with him for the purpose of performing the duty of the substituted bungalow- peon at Hazipur, and asked the writ-petitioner to stay at Chittaranjan and serve as bungalow-peon at that place so long his family was not shifted to Hazipur. The writ-petitioner, accordingly, performed his duty as substituted bungalow-peon at Chittaranjan till.the month of April, 2004.