PRAN GOPAL ROY Vs. LAKMI BANERJEE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This application is directed against an order dated December 19, 1991, passed by the Sub -Inspector of Schools, Primary Education, Calcutta, Circle -ll, in terms whereof salaries of 5 teachers including the Petitioners, who are 3 in number, were directed to be held up.

(2.) The fact of the matter is not required to be stated in details in view of the order proposed to be passed* by me. Suffice it to say that an Administrator had been managing the affairs of the school. The said Administrator allegedly was appointed a long time back by the District Inspector of Schools (P.E), Calcutta.

(3.) The case made out in the affidavit -in -opposition appears to be that the Headmaster of the school has been withholding the attendance registers as a result whereof the Administrator had not been able to verify the same and monthly returns could not be sent to the appropriate authority for the purpose of making payment.