ADITYA LAL MUKHERJEE Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Both the above noted CRRs, that is 1575 of 2013 and 1297 of 2011 involve identical parties. In CRR 1575 of 2013 the petitioner is the accused and the de facto complainant is the opposite party No.2. In CRR 1297 of 2011 the de facto complainant is the petitioner and the petitioner in CRR 1575 of 2013 is the opposite party no.2. The State is the opposite party in both the CRRs.

(2.) Therefore, on the prayer of the parties the two applications have been taken up for analogous hearing. In CRR 1575 of 2013 the petitioner, Aditya Lal Mukerjee has challenged the judgement and order dated 26th March, 2013 passed by the Learned Chief Judge, City Sessions Court, Calcutta in Criminal Revision no.28 of 2013 thereby dismissing the same and affirming the orders dated 16th January 2013 and 26th February 2013 passed by the Ld. 6th Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta in GR Case No.1217 of 1999 and GR 1457 of 1999.

(3.) By the impugned Order No.4 dated 26th March, 2013 the learned Chief Judge was pleased to record as follows :-