DHANANJOY SAHA Vs. W B STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The undisputed fact of the case is that the petitioner has been a consumer of electricity for last 30 years without any blemish. By a letter dated 10th November, 2003, Annexure 'P-2', he informed the respondent No. 3 the Station Superintendent of the West Bengal State Electricity Board that something was wrong with his meter which he had noticed on previous one or two days. The Station Superintendent was requested to inspect the meter and to take appropriate step so that the meter worked properly. On 14th November, 2003 the respondent No. 3 inspected the meter and recorded in the meter card "no display" under his signature. The respondent No. 3 thereafter continued to issue bills to the petitioner on an average basis. For the month of June, 2004, the petitioner was billed for 750 average units, for the month of July, 2004 no consumption was shown, for the month of August, 2004 he was billed for 1000 units, for the month of September, 2004 he was again billed for 1000 units. Except for the bill of September, 2004, all earlier bills were duly paid by the petitioner. On 3rd November, 2004 in the absence of the petitioner and without any notice to him the respondent No. 3 disconnected supply of electricity. Alleging inter alia that the aforesaid act of disconnection was arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional the present writ petition was filed.

(2.) The respondent No. 3 has filed an affidavit on behalf of the respondents wherein following justification is to be found for disconnection of the supply of electricity. "On 3rd November, 2004 at about 3 P.M. the Industrial meter/Service connection of the consumer was inspected by the inspecting team of the respondents along with the Police personnel. During inspection it was detected by the said Team that the 3 Phase State Meter at the premises was Tampered by damaging of the portion of the meter. Immediately the service connection was disconnected and FIR was lodged by the Assistant Engineer on the same day before the concerned Police Station being P/S case No. 175/04 dated 3rd November, 2004. The damaged meter was seized and was deposited at the concern Police Station. On 5th November, 2004 the assessment made by the under signed for pilferage of energy of Rs. 1,31,533/- along with other charges as per law under Section 126 of the Electricity Act 2003 was sent to the Consumer vide Memo No. NBG/FI04/4A/ 1703 dated 5th November, 2004 for making payment for reconnection of his service connection.

(3.) The FIR lodged by the respondent No. 3 shows that during a period of 20 minutes that is to say between 15.05 hours and 15.25 hours on 3rd November, 2004 after an inspection supply of electricity was disconnected; the meter was removed; seized; packed and labeled and the petitioner was charged under Section 135(1)(b) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The allegation of theft was made on the basis that "On visual inspection, 'ultrasonic' seals on side of meter found tampered. Also 'VOID' mark noticed on plastic sticker seal on sides of meter."