REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

MANJU BANERJEE Appellant

V/S

DEBABRATA PAL Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SURENDRA NATH BANERJEE V. CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURT AT FORT WILLIAM IN BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
PURUSHOTTAMADAS GOEL V. B.S. DHILLON. [REFERRED TO]
SUKHDEV SINGH VS. HONBLE C J S TEJA SINGH AND THE HONBLE JUDGES OF THE PEPSU HIGH COURT AT PATIALA [REFERRED TO]
BARADA KANTA MISHRA VS. MR: JUSTICE GATIKRUSHNA MISRA CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE ORISSA HIGH COURT [REFERRED TO]
D N TANEJA VS. BHAJAN LAL [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BANGALORE VS. D P SHARMA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MAHBOOB S ALLIBHOY [REFERRED TO]
S GOPAL REDDY VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
L CHANDRA KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VAIJANATH VS. GURAMMA [REFERRED TO]
T SUDHAKAR PRASAD VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
R P BHARDWAJ VS. KIRAN AGGARWAL [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) -The question which has cropped up in this case is whether the order dated 30.03.2004 passed by West Bengal Land Reforms & Tenancy Tribunal (LRTT.) holding that no contempt was committed by the Block Land & Land Reforms Officer, Nanoor can be challenged before this Court by filing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

(2.) To put it differently, the only point on which the matter was argued before this Court was whether the order of LRTT by which it refused to exercise its jurisdiction under the Contempt of Courts Act can be assailed before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of the Constitution Bench Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India.

(3.) No other controversy of the case was urged before us in this matter.

Click here to view full judgment.

MANJU BANERJEE Vs. DEBABRATA PAL

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address