REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

JAHARLAL SAHA Appellant

V/S

PRADIP SAHA Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SUMILITA BHATTACHARYA AND ANR. VS. NILA CHATTERJEE [REFERRED TO]
GOPAL CHANDRA DAS VS. SARASWATI BASAK [REFERRED TO]
KANJI MANJI VS. TRUSTEES OF PORT OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
BODDU VENKATAKRISHNA RAO VS. BODDU SATYAVATHI [REFERRED TO]
GANPAT LADHA VS. SASHIKANT VISHNU SHINDE [REFERRED TO]
JAVED AHMED ABDUL HAMID PAWALA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
GIAN DEVI ANAND VS. JEEVAN KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
H C PANDEY VS. G C PAUL [REFERRED TO]
TEXTILE ASSOCIATION INDIA BOMBAY UNIT VS. BALMOHAN GOPAL KURUP [REFERRED TO]
SURAYYA BEGUM MST RENU SHARMA VS. MOHAMMAD USMAN:RAGHBIRKAURBHATIA MRS [REFERRED TO]
KUMAR JAGDISH CHANDRA SINHA VS. EILEENK PATRICIA DROZARIE MRS [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK CHINTAMAN JUKER VS. KISHORE PANDURANG MANTRI [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA PRAKASH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. HANSOLI DEVI [REFERRED TO]
AMAL KRISHNA ADITYA VS. GANESH CHANDRA DAS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) As prayed for by Mr. Chatterjee, learned Advocate-on-record for the appellants, he is permitted to correct the cause title of the Memorandum of the Appeal in S. A.T. No. 3489 of 2005.

(2.) These two second appeals arise out of a suit for eviction and are directed against a judgment of reversal.

(3.) The only question that arises for determination in these two second appeals is whether in the absence of all the heirs of the deceased contractual tenant, a suit for eviction is maintainable by impleading some of the heirs.

Click here to view full judgment.

JAHARLAL SAHA Vs. PRADIP SAHA

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address