JITENDRA NATH ROY Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The subject-matter of this writ petition is a circular dated 14th April, 2003 issued by the Joint Secretary, West Bengal State Election Commission providing inter alia that the members of National Volunteer Force and Home Guards are not eligible to contest in the Panchayat Elections. The petitioner has challenged the legality of the said circular and has also prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue to function as an elected member of the Hemtabad Panchayat Samity. The undisputed facts of the case are as follows :- The petitioner, enrolled as a Home Guard and posted at Hemtabad Police Station, by a letter dated 8th April, 2003, applied to the Superintendent of Police concerned for grant of leave during the period between 9th April, 2003 and 14th April, 2003. On 9th April, 2003 the petitioner filed his nomination paper for election to the Hemtabad Panchayat Samity. On 14th April, 2003 the aforesaid circular was issued by the Election Commission. On 26th April, 2003 the petitioner appears to have applied to the Superintendent of Police for leave during the period between 1st May, 2003 and 28th May, 2003. The petitioner was declared to have been elected to the Hemtabad Panchayat Samity on 14th May, 2003. The respondent No. 5, a member of the said Hemtabad Panchayat Samity applied to the District Magistrate on 5th August, 2003 challenging the election of the petitioner on the basis of the aforesaid circular dated 14th April, 2003 and prayed for a declaration that the petitioner Was disqualified. The petitioner appears to have been directed by the District Magistrate to appear before him for a hearing on 18th August, 2003. The present writ petition was filed on 2nd September, 2003. An ad interim order directing the parties to maintain status quo was passed by this Court on 29th September, 2003. The matter thereafter was taken up for hearing on 8th October, 2004 when this Court, after hearing the parties, directed the prescribed authority to dispose of the matter, challenging the election of the petitioner subject however to the result of the writ petition. On 3rd November, 2004 the prescribed authority declared the petitionerto have been disqualified to contest the election since he was ineligible under the circular dated 14th April, 2003 to contest the same. By the same order he was also removed from office with immediate effect. The writ petition was thereafter taken up for hearing on 11th January, 2005.

(2.) Mr. Milan Bhattacharya, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted :-

(3.) Mr. L. C. Bihani, learned Senior Advocate appearing forthe Election Commission submitted that:-