LAWS(CAL)-1994-2-16

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs. K A G ARATOON EXECUTOR TO THE ESTATE OF MRS IRIS ARATOON DECD AND TRUSTEES TO ESTATE A STEPHEN DECDREPRESENTING ESTATE OF MRS RIPSY GAULSTAN DECD

Decided On February 25, 1994
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX Appellant
V/S
K.A.G. ARATOON (EXECUTOR TO THE ESTATE OF MRS. IRIS ARATOON (DECD.)) AND TRUSTEES TO ESTATE A STEPHEN (DECD.) (REPRESENTING ESTATE OF MRS. RIPSY GAULSTAN (DECD.)) Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this reference, under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, made at the instance of the Revenue, the following questions are referred by the Tribunal for the opinion of this court :

(2.) The facts as found by the Tribunal are as under : The assessee along with her three sisters, being daughters of the late Aratoon Stephen (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") had been enjoying certain benefits from several trusts created by the deceased by his will dated August 15, 1925. The deceased settled certain properties in several trusts and appointed three gentlemen as trustees. He appointed his wife as the guardian of his infant children during her lifetime and after death the trustees were to act as guardians of the said children.

(3.) Particulars of settlement in trust made in favour of the children are set out in paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the said will. These very clauses came up for consideration before this court in CWT v. Mrs. Dorothy Martin [1968] 69 ITR 586. On a construction of the various clauses in the will, this court held that the assessee, as a daughter of the testator, was entitled to an aliquot share in the general income of the residuary trust fund and not to a fixed sum payable periodically as annuity and, therefore, the value of her share was properly assessable to wealth-tax as the net wealth of the assessee.