SRIMATI PREETI RUNGTA Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The primary issue involved in this writ proceeding is the nature of power of the income-tax authorities under Section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (referred to hereafter as "the Act"). The issue arises in the following manner : The petitioner claims to be a relative of one Vishwanath More who gifted a relief bond to the petitioner. The relief bond was for Rs. 2 lakhs bearing interest at nine per cent. per annum payable annually from July, 1988, and was repayable on July 1, 1993. Vishwanath More executed a document on July 27, 1988, which stated, inter alia :

(2.) Under cover of a letter dated April 11, 1989, addressed to the Reserve Bank of India, the petitioner enclosed the certificate of the bond as well as the form of transfer executed by Vishwanath More in her favour as well as the interest warrants issued in the name of Vishwanath More. The name of the petitioner has been noted by the Reserve Bank of India on the certificate as a transferee, the date of transfer being given as March 23, 1989. According to the petitioner, she has been paid interest on the said bond up to the year 1991 by the Reserve Bank of India.

(3.) On February 16, 1992, Vishwanath More died. On February 18, 1992, an order was issued by respondent No. 1 under Section 281 of the Act in respect of Vishwanath More stating that Vishwanath More had made an absolute irrecovable gift of Rs. 2 lakhs to the petitioner on July 27, 1988, and that Vishwanath More was in default in making payment of income-tax/wealth-tax and penalties to the tune of Rs. 18,79,773 which had been lying unpaid since 1978. This order (which has been impugned in these proceedings) concludes with the following sentences :