BAMBRIDGE Vs. INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) having stated the facts and read section 18 of the Finance Act, 1936, as set out above, continued :

(2.) The argument for the Crown as regards Mrs. Bambridges interest under her fathers settlement is to the effect that she acquired the rights in question by means of the transfer to Kamouraska Investments Ltd. made by her father, in conjunction with an associated operation in the shape of his settlement of his shares and debentures in Kamouraska Investments Ltd.; and this argument was accepted by the judge.

(3.) The argument for Mrs. Bambridge as regards this same interest is to the effect that she acquired the rights in question not by means simply of the transfer and the settlement, but by means of those two transactions together with the deaths of her father and mother. It is said that those deaths constituted essential links in Mrs. Bambridges title to the rights in question; that the links were not associated operations within the meaning of the section; and that, in order to bring the rights in question within the mischief of the section, it must be shown that Mrs. Bambridge acquired them strictly in the way postulated by the section, that is to say, by means either of the transfer alone or of the transfer in conjunction with associated operations, and by no other alternative or ancillary means.