M/S. TSG EMERALD VIEW Vs. LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE writ applications are filed assailing a common order No. 2270 dated May 08, 2012 passed by the respondent No. 3. The impugned order was passed in compliance of the orders passed in connection with writ applications filed by the writ petitioners.

(2.) THE respondent No. 2 issued individual demand notices to the petitioners raising demands towards property tax on the hotels and lodges run by the petitioners. The writ petitioners filed separate writ applications challenging the aforesaid demand notices.

(3.) THE operative portion of the above order is set out below: -