KANAILAL DEY Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has approached this Court challenging a decision rendered by the District Inspector of Schools (PE), Hooghly, consequent upon an order passed by this Court on 10th July, 2007, in an earlier writ petition, being WP No.24167 (W) of 2005.

(2.) PERUSING the impugned decision, it appears that the same has been rendered in conformity with the specific directions given by the Court, as contained in the order dated 10th July, 2007. The impugned decision is also supported with cogent reasons and the concerned authority has considered the entire matter in details, including its factual aspects.

(3.) THE writ petitioner had accepted the finality of the above order, which was passed at his instance, in respect of the earlier writ petition that he had moved, being WP No.24167 (W) of 2005. A plain reading of the relevant portion of the order dated 10th July, 2007, as reproduced hereinabove, reveals that while disposing of the earlier writ petition, the Court has specifically directed the concerned District Inspector of Schools (PE) to give a reasoned decision in the matter, after making necessary enquiry and also after obtaining reports from the concerned Sub - Inspector of Schools and District Inspector of Schools, who were in office when the letter dated 26th June, 2003, was issued. That apart, the District Inspector of Schools was also granted liberty to obtain opinion from the handwriting expert, if it was necessary.