REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

ASHOK KUMAR JAISWAL Appellant

V/S

Ashim Kumar Kar Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

SATGURU NIRMAN (P) LTD. V. NARAYANA CHANDRA PAUL [REFERRED TO]
SATGURU NIRMAN PVT. LTD V. NARAYAN CHANDRA PAUL [REFERRED TO]
SETH LOON KARAN SETHIYA VS. IVAN E JOHN [REFERRED TO]
GANGA BAI VS. VIJAY KUMAR [REFERRED TO]
BAI DOSABAI MATHURDAS GOVINDDAS VS. MATHURDAS GOVINDDAS:BAI DOSABAI [REFERRED TO]
DHANNALAL VS. KALAWATIBAI [REFERRED TO]
FAQIR CHAND GULATI VS. UPPAL AGENCIES PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
LALU PRASAD YADAV VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
B PREMANAND VS. MOHAN KOIKAL [REFERRED TO]
LOON KARAN SETHIYA VS. IVAN E JOHN [REFERRED TO]
MUKTAKESI DAWN VS. HARIPADA MAZUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
BIRAT CHANDRA DAGARA VS. TAURIAN EXIM PVT LTD [REFERRED TO]
BHASKAR ADITYA VS. MINATI MAJUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
KALIDAS SADHU VS. SUSHIL KUMAR AGARWAL [REFERRED TO]
VIPIN BHIMANI VS. SUNANDA DAS [REFERRED TO]
BIMAL KUMAR KHETAWAT VS. DHAN DAULAT HOLDING LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
BIMAL GHOSH VS. KALPANA MAJUMDAR [REFERRED TO]
PRATHA SARATHI GHOSE VS. MAA CONSTRUCTION [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS VS. ANIL KUMAR BHUIYA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I have gone through the painstaking well versed judgment of My Lord the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjib Banerjee. I fully endorse his view. Yet I wish to add few lines looking at the problem slightly from a different angle.

(2.) The owners would contend, section 14(3)(c)(iii) would specifically debar a developer to file a suit for specific performance against the owner of the property. They would gain support from Vipin Bhimani . They would also contend, we must give literal meaning to the provision that the Apex Court recognized as the golden principle of interpretation as observed in Lalu Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Bihar .

(3.) The relevant extract of section 14 is set out below:

Click here to view full judgment.

ASHOK KUMAR JAISWAL Vs. ASHIM KUMAR KAR

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address