REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

UNION OF INDIA Appellant

V/S

KAMRUP INDUSTRIAL GASES LTD. Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

BUNGE AND CO. V. DEWAR AND WEBB [REFERRED TO]
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR MANITOBA V. KELLY [REFERRED TO]
BANQUE DE PARIS ET DES PAYS BAS (SUISSE) S.A. V. COSTA DE NARAY AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN WALTER [REFERRED TO]
A M MAIR AND CO VS. GORDHANDAS SAGARMULL [REFERRED TO]
ALOPI PARSHAD AND SONS LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
JIVARAJBHAI UJAMSHI SHETH VS. CHINTAPANRAO BALAJI [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER IRRIGATION BALIMELA VS. ABHADUTA JENA [REFERRED TO]
CONTINENTAL CONSTRUCTION CO LIMITED VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR VS. HAJI GHULAM RASOOL RATHER AND SONS [REFERRED TO]
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERING CO VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA VS. G C ROY:RAGHUNATH MOHAPATRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. PURI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. B N AGARWALLA [REFERRED TO]
NEW INDIA CIVIL ERECTORS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED VS. J C BUDHARAJA GOVERNMENT AND MINING CONTRACTOR [REFERRED TO]
RAJASTHAN STATE MINES AND MINERALS LIMITED VS. EASTERN ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES [REFERRED TO]
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DHENKANAL MINOR IRRIGATION DIVISION ORISSA VS. N C BUDHARAJ [REFERRED TO]
PRADIP PORT TRUST VS. UNIQUE BUILDERS [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIAREPRESENTING VS. J P SHARMA SONS [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The defendant/appellant, Union of India, entered into an agreement with the plaintiff/respondent, M/s. Kamrup Industrial Gases Limited, for purchase of Oxygen and Acetylene industrial gases on the terms and conditions contained therein. Pursuant to the said agreement, the plaintiff was allowed to install a plant for manufacturing of the industrial gases for supply to the defendant on a site allotted by the defendant within its factory premises agreeing to purchase the entire production. In consideration the defendant agreed to supply water and electricity to the plaintiff's plant on the terms and conditions stipulated. The said agreement also contained an agreement for arbitration.

(2.) What is the amount refundable to us by Diesel Locomotive Works for the excess charges made by them for electricity supplied to us for the period 1.1.70 onwards.

(3.) What is the amount refundable to us by the Diesel Locomotive Works for charging us statutory duty when such duty was not charged by U.P. Electricity Board from Diesel Locomotive Works.

Click here to view full judgment.

UNION OF INDIA Vs. KAMRUP INDUSTRIAL GASES LTD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address