(1.) The short point calls for determination in the present writ petition is that whether after the order of dismissal of the writ Petitioner, Kshirode Chandra Roy, from service, being set aside by the judgment of this Court, the Respondent State Bank Authorities would be entitled to proceed afresh, on the basis of the liberty given by the learned Single Judge, without re -instating the writ Petitioner and without payment of back wages for the intervening period.
(2.) The facts of this case is as follows:
(3.) Ultimately, on November 26, 1984, and January 10, 1985, the aforesaid amount of Rs. 2,000 and Rs. 5,000 were repaid by the writ Petitioner to the said Raj Banijya Pratisthan.