UDAY SANKAR DAS Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present writ petition has been preferred primarily for the following relief:

(2.) Facts as unfurled in the writ petition, in brief, are that the petitioner was appointed as 'Night Guard' on 13/2/1974 by the then learned District Judge, 24 Parganas. He was promoted to the post of 'Process Server' w.e.f. 20/7/1976 and on attaining the age of superannuation, he retired from service on 31/7/2012.

(3.) The respondent no. 4 was appointed as 'Process Server' in the same Judgeship on 28/5/1981 and consequently, the respondent no. 4 happened to be junior to the petitioner in service. The respondent no. 4 retired from service on 30/6/2012 on attaining the age of superannuation. The petitioner's last drawn basic pay was Rs.26, 361.00 p.m. whereas the respondent no.4 drew Rs.29,748.00p.m. as basic pay at the time of his retirement. The petitioner has been drawing pension to the tune of Rs.11,556.00 p.m.