LAWS(CAL)-2023-8-143

JHANTU MAHAPATRA Vs. NIRANJAN DEB

Decided On August 03, 2023
Jhantu Mahapatra Appellant
V/S
Niranjan Deb Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dtd. 27/4/2018 passed by the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Contai, Purba Medinipur, in C.R. Case No. 116 of 2017, thereby finding the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein not guilty of the charge for commission of an offence punishable under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and acquitting them from the instant case.

(2.) The complainant/appellant's case is that M/s Maa Manasha Enterprise of which appellant is the proprietor, was appointed as Super Stockiest of Delicious Agro Pvt. Ltd. for the area of East Midnapore on 31/8/2016. The appellant advanced payment in favour of the company of which the private respondents are directors for supply of goods. But no goods were delivered to the appellant. The appellant issued a letter dtd. 20/2/2016 addressing the private respondents calling for refund of the money advanced. Under such circumstances, to discharge their legal liability, the private respondents in the capacity of Directors of Delicious Agro Pvt. Ltd. issued an Account Payee Cheque in favour of the appellant dtd. 31/1/2017 bearing No. 735627 drawn on UC Bank, Jodhpur Park Branch for an amount of Rs.10,80,270.00

(3.) On 3/2/2017, the appellant deposited the said cheque bearing No. 735627 drawn on UC Bank, Jodhpur Park Branch for Rs.10,80,270.00 with Canara Bank, Khar Branch in Account No.5822201000038, well within the validity period of the said Chqeue. But the said cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient fund and the said cheque was returned to the appellant by Canara Bank on 3/3/2017 by way of Speed Post along with an attached Returned Memo.