RAJAT KUMAR VARSHNEY Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In this writ petition as filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ petitioner has challenged the order of dismissal dated April 7, 2016 as passed by the Disciplinary Authority of the Respondent No.1 Bank who is the Respondent No.3 in this writ petition and which has been affirmed by the Appellate Authority ( Respondent No.4 herein) by his order dated November 3, 2016.

(2.) Before the Inquiry Authority, the present writ petitioner being the delinquent has faced the following four charges :

(3.) The delinquent/writ petitioner has submitted his statement of defence and thereafter the inquiry proceedings proceeded against him and on conclusion of the same, the inquiry officer found that the Charge No.1 has been partially proved and the remaining charges have not been proved against the delinquent/writ petitioner.