(1.) Appellants have assailed an order dated August 18, 2020 passed by the learned Trial Judge clarifying an order dated July 12, 2019 in the present appeal.
(2.) Respondent Nos 1 and 2 in the appeal have questioned the maintainability of the appeal by way of an interim application being IA GA No. 4 of 2021. An application being IA GA No. 6 of 2023 has been filed seeking permission of the Court to address the Court in the virtual platform. Another application being IA GA No. 7 has been filed for framing a scheme for management and administration.
(3.) Since, an issue of maintainability of the appeal had been raised at the behest of the respondent nos 1 and 2 they were allowed to address the Court first. The respondent no. 7 has supported the respondent nos. 1 and 2 in the appeal and they were heard immediately after the respondent nos. 1 and 2. Thereafter, the appellant, the respondent no. 8 and the added respondent no. 10 had addressed the Court. All the parties had addressed the Court on the point of maintainability as also on the merits of the case.