MALINA BHATTACHARYYA Vs. SABITRI BHATTACHARJEE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition is a sheer waste of time as the petitioners do not wish to put the petitioners' money where the petitioners mouth is.

(2.) The petitioners sought an extreme indulgence in applying for amendment of the plaint in the year 2012 in a suit filed in the year 1991. It is the admitted position that the trial had commenced long before the application for amendment was filed. The petitioners say that grave injustice has been done to the petitioners in the trial court disallowing the real matter in controversy between the parties being brought on record. Nothing has been said as to what prevented the petitioners from applying earlier. The petitioners seem to be oblivious to the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code.

(3.) Urgent certified photocopies of this order, if applied for, will be made available to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.