LOLIT KARATI Vs. MENOKARANI DOGRA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) When this matter was called out for hearing none appeared on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff. The learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the defendant/appellant has made and completed his submission.

(2.) The facts of the case, briefly, are as follows:-

(3.) The plaintiffs further case was that the plaintiff had asked the defendant to vacate the suit premises on 23-01-1998 and deliver up khas possession in favour of the plaintiff but the defendant did not comply with the plaintiff/respondent's request and, as such, the suit was filed.