SUDIP DAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA (UOI)

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a case where the present petitioner has been charged for commission of offence punishable under Section 89(1)(d) of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended). While canvassing the prayer for bail, the learned lawyer of the petitioner contended on the following points:--

(2.) So saying the learned lawyer of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has fixed abode at Calcutta and he is not likely to abscond and, therefore, he may be favoured with an order of bail.

(3.) The learned lawyer of the Union of India strongly resisted the prayer for bail and drew my attention to the following facts:--