LAWS(CAL)-2003-7-25

HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED Vs. CAVINKARELIMITED

Decided On July 16, 2003
HINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED Appellant
V/S
CAVINKARE LIMITED Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This contempt application has arisen in connection with the petitioners/plaintiffs action for infringement of their process patent of their product Fair and Lovely skin cream. The petitioner sought various reliefs including damages against the respondents/defendants, and in connection therewith application for interlocutory relief was taken out and they were successful in obtaining order of injunction from this Court. However, that interim order of injunction was vacated on combined disposal of the suit and the interlocutory application. Good sense prevailed upon between the parties as they settled the dispute, involved in the suit, as well as the interlocutory application by filing the terms of settlement. The relevant clauses of the terms of settlement, which are germane in the contempt application, are set out hereunder.

(2.) Once it was thought that the dispute and differences between the parties have come to an end but it reveals now in present contempt application the plaintiff alleges breach of undertaking. Now, it is being examined whether there is breach of the aforesaid Undertaking.

(3.) Before I examine the nature of the allegations, I would appropriately record that the aforesaid undertaking not only recorded in the signed document, namely the terms of settlement filed in Court, but the respondent No. 3 himself appeared before this Court and on oath, he accepted and acknowledged the aforesaid undertaking having been given to this Court.