NIRMAL KUMAR BANERJEE Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an application for bail by one of the accused persons in G R Case No 790/71 of Uttarpara P. S. under Sections 364, 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

(2.) STATE opposed the prayer for bail.

(3.) MR . Sadhan Gupta. Advocate appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner Nirmal is an employee at Calcutta Telephone Bhavan. has a large family of. 13 members depending on him; that the entire family will be financially ruined if he is further kept in hazat; that he regularly attended and did his duty at '23' Calcutta Telephone Exchange in May and from June to the 3rd August, 1971. He further submitted that the petitioner did not abscond or tamper with evidence and is not likely to abscond or tamper with evidence, that the petitioner has not been mentioned in F. I, R, or in first remand petition before the Magistrate.