GOBINDA DAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner in this WP under art. 226 dated December 23, 2004 is questioning a decision of Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute dated January 21, 2002 (WP p.24). Relevant parts of the decision are quoted below:

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed in the institute as a Plumber in 1965. He was retired from service as TA B -1. Case stated in para.4 of the WP is as follows: -

(3.) AFFIDAVIT -in -Opposition has been filed, and case stated in para.5 of the AO is as follows: -