HEMANTA BYABORTHA Vs. UTTAM SASMAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application is at the instance of the opposite party / landlord and is directed against the Order dated July 28, 2005 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Barrackpore in HRC No.484 of 2002 thereby directing the tenant / opposite party herein to deposit the rent in the Court of Additional Rent Controller, Barrackpore at his own risk. Being aggrieved by such order, the landlord has preferred this application.

(2.) THE opposite party herein has claimed that he has been occupying a tiled-shed room with pucca walls along with a varendah on the front side, a portion whereof is being covered as a kitchen with common user of bathroom, privy and Municipal tap water. A dispute arose between the tenant and the landlord / petitioner herein regarding payment of rent and for that reason, the petitioner approached the Additional Rent Controller, Barrackpore for deposit of rent and that prayer was granted by the impugned order. Being aggrieved by such order, this application has been preferred.

(3.) HAVING considered the above settled position of law, I am of the view that this Court is not in a position to entertain an application against an order passed by the Additional Rent Controller in dealing with an application under Section 21 of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act.