(1.) THE petitioner in this WP under art.226 of the Constitution is questioning a decision of the Regional Transport Authority, Burdwan dated August 27, 2012 (WP p.48).
(2.) SOME of the holders of permit plying vehicles on the route concerned were given rotational timetable; and the petitioner one of the holders of permit entitled to ply her vehicle on the route was given a fixed timetable. Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner submitted an application requesting the RTA to give her a rotational timetable like the other permit holders. Alleging inaction she moved a WP before this Court. It was disposed of directing the RTA to give a decision. Accordingly, the RTA gave the decision.
(3.) MR . Chattopadhyay appearing for one Debasis Manna, a permit holder, and plying his vehicle on the route according to a rational timetable prays for leave to intervene. He submits that his client wants to contest the WP by filing opposition.