CHANCHAL GOSWAMI Vs. TAPATI MUKHERJEE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THESE three revisional applications under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are directed against three separate orders passed by the learned Judge of the appellate Court in Title Appeal No. 42 of 2011. The applications were heard one after the other and I propose to dispose of the same by this common judgment and order.

(2.) FACTS leading to the orders impugned in the revisional applications filed by the parties may be noted first.

(3.) A suit for eviction (Ejectment Suit No.61 of 2006) was instituted by Dr. Ms. Tapati Mukherjee (hereafter the plaintiff) against Sri Chanchal Goswami (hereafter the defendant) seeking his eviction from the suit property i.e. a flat measuring more or less 1200 sq.ft. comprised of three rooms, one kitchen, one bath room cum privy and one balcony, situate at Hindusthan Park, Kolkata - 700019. Eviction of the defendant was prayed for on twin grounds, viz. (i) default in payment of rent by the defendant attracting Section 6(1)(b) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997 (hereafter the Act); and acquisition of a flat by the defendant at Keyatala Road, Kolkata - 700029 thereby attracting Section 6(1)(j) of the Act.