IN RE: AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 482 READ WITH SECTION 397 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RE: ASRAF ALI MUNSI Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner herein Asraf Ali Munsi is present personally and submits that he suffering for last one and half year as his Advocate is not co-operating him and, as such, he wants to make submission personally.

(2.) LEAVE is granted. Mr. Shyama Prasad Purkeit, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the opposite parties are present. Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the State is also present.

(3.) THE petitioner herein has not challenged that order. To be stated precisely, the order dated 17.6.2010 is not in force because the learned Court fixed 21.9.2011 for hearing of the accused persons under Section 251 of the Cr. P. C. THE order dated 17.6.2011 does not say anything about the application taken out by the present petitioner for further investigation into the case or by that order, the learned Court did not dispose of the application taken out by the present petitioner. It was a routine order and in fact, lost its force by virtue of order dated 16.5.2011 whereby the learned Court disposed of the application taken out by the petitioner praying for further investigation by the Officer-in-charge of Sonarpur Police Station and fixed a specific date for examination of the accused under Section 251 of the Cr. P. C.