HIMANGSU SEKHAR PAUL Vs. KISHORI LAL PAUL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This matter has come up before me lor review of taxation of the Bill of Cost No. 272 of 1967 and for an order, inter alia for varying and/or setting aside the findings of the Taxing Officer given on 12th August, 1970. The matter in question arises out of an application made before A. N. Sen J. by one of the parties herein claiming the following reliefs :--

(2.) That application was moved before A. N. Sen J. on a notice of motion and an order was made inter alia to the following effect :

(3.) When the matter came up before the Assistant Taxing Officer it was contended on behalf of the applicant that the matter before A. N. Sen J. should have been moved by chamber summons and not by way of notice of motion and the bill of cost should be allowed in accordance with the scale of fees or charges prescribed for chamber summons. The Assistant Taxing Officer upheld the contention. The matter was heard on appeal by the Taxing Officer on 12th August. 1970 and the same was set aside by the said Taxing Officer. It has now come up before this Court for review.