SWAPAN ROY Vs. SIMA SARKAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The challenge in this revisional application is to the judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hooghly on 15.5.2006 in Criminal Appeal No. 4 of 2004 whereby the judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hooghly, on 23.12.2003 in Criminal Case No. 405 of 2000 was affirmed.

(2.) The factual background of this revisional application is stated in brief below:

(3.) After taking cognizance of the offence, the trial commenced. In course of trial, the Chief Judicial Magistrate recorded evidence of as many as five witnesses examined on behalf of the complainant (Respondent No. l herein) and four witnesses on behalf of the Petitioner. Some documents including the cheque in question, copies of notice, postal envelopes containing the notice of complaint as well as endorsement of the postal departments and the bank account statement were admitted into evidence and marked Exhibits on behalf of both the parties.