DINESH KUMAR SONI Vs. SANTOSH SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE hearing stems from an application filed by the petitioner praying for revision of order No. 42 dated 11.01.2002 passed by Learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 4th Court, Sealdah in T.S. No. 19 of 1997 by way of setting aside the same, inter alia on the ground that learned Court below erred in law in not appreciating the true spirits of the order and passed an order which is conflicting in the interest of the parties to the litigation.

(2.) THE petitioner as plaintiff filed a title suit being No. 19 of 1997 in the aforesa9d Court praying for declaration and permanent injunction. After filing the suit plaintiff / petitioner moved an application for injunction and learned Trial Court by order No. 37 dated 12.01.2001 allowed the injunction application on contest and directed both sides to maintain statusquo with regard to the nature, character and possession of the suit property. THE defendant / opposite party filed a title suit being No. 71 of 1997 and also made an application for injunction and subsequently filed an application under Section 151 of the C.P.C. praying for a direction upon the O.C. Belgharia P.S. or implementation of the order dated 12.03.2001. Learned Civil Judge passed an order being Order No. 53 dated 11.01.2001 direct the O.C. Belgharia P.S. to implement the order dated 12.03.2001. Against such order the petitioner moved in revision before the District Judge and learned District Judge stayed all further proceedings in Title Suit No. 71 of 1997. THEreafter by order No. 42 dated 11.01.2002 both the title Suit Being No. 71 of 2007 and 90 of 1997 was taken up for analogous hearing and after passing the order the analogous hearing it is alleged that Learned Court below took up an application under Section 151 of the C.P.C. for hearing and allowed the application directing the O.C. Belgharia P.S. to implement the order dated 12.03.2001. According to petitioner in Title Suit No. 19 of 1997 no application under Section 151 of C.P.C. was either filed by the petitioner or by the opposite parties.

(3.) CONSIDERING the submission of the both side I think that both side should be given an opportunity to agitate the prayer for police help before the Court below afresh. Meanwhile both sides will not disturb the right and interest of the other side. In view of the aforesaid submission the Civil Revision is hereby allowed. The order of police help passed by the Court below is hereby set aside. Learned Trial Court hereby directed to hear the application of police help within 15 days from the date of communication of the order and after giving an opportunity to the both side for hearing and passed a reasoned order in accordance with the law.