KAYPEE ENTERPRISE Vs. SANTOSH KUMAR SARAOGI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS Review Application is a direction against the order dated July 26, 2010 passed by this Hon?ble Bench in C.O. No. 2348 of 2009 thereby disposing of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners.

(2.) THE short fact is that the plaintiff ? O.P.s herein instituted a suit being Title Suit No. 2838 of 2008 against the O.P.s for a decree of declaration that the plaintiff is a monthly tenant and its proprietress Smt. Sushila Dalmia and other members of her family are entitled to use and enjoy the tenanted premises as described in the schedule of the plaint.

(3.) BEING aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a Revisional Application which was disposed of by setting aside the impugned order. However, liberty was given to the O.P. No.1 to apply the self-same relief afterwards if the situation so demands. BEING aggrieved this application was preferred.