RADHA RANI DUTTA Vs. CESC LIMITED

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioners in this art. 226 petition dated November 2, 2011 are seeking the following principal relief:

(2.) The second petitioner filed an application before the Executive Magistrate under section 144(2) Cr.PC that Manik, a trespasser, was making wrongful attempts to take supply of electricity to the premises in question.

(3.) Thereafter the first petitioner wrote a letter asking CESC not to give supply of electricity to Manik. By a letter dated October 22, 2011 CESC informed the first petitioner that she was wrongfully preventing people of the licensee from giving supply of electricity to Manik.