SAMIRAN DEY Vs. SWAPAN DUTTA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE challenge in this revisional application is to the judgment and order dated 15th December, 2003 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 1, Burdwan in Sessions Case No. 104 of 2002 (S.T. No. 32 of 2003) thereby acquitting the accused-opposite parties (hereinafter referred to as the opposite parties) from the charges under Sections 498A and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

(2.) THE petitioner, being the defacto-complainant of the case, has come up with this application for revision challenging the legality, validity and propriety of the judgment impugned on the following grounds:

(3.) THE defacto-complainant, Samiran, has come up with this application for revision of the judgment praying for setting aside of the same and for retrial/rehearing of the case on the grounds stated earlier. THE point to be considered is whether the judgment impugned is sustainable in law and is liable to be set aside by exercising revisional jurisdiction by this Court.