NATIONAL BANK FOR AGRICULTURE Vs. DIPANKAR SEN ROY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Both the appeals relate to identical facts and involve common points of law. Therefore, the said appeals were heard analogously and we also dispose of the same by this common judgment.

(2.) The relevant facts leading to these appeals are briefly stated hereinafter:

(3.) After issuance of the aforesaid charge sheet enquiry proceeding was conducted and the enquiry officer after the conclusion of the enquiry submitted his report before the disciplinary authority. In the said enquiry report, the enquiry officer specifically observed that the charge of abetting the act of writing on the wall was not established. The disciplinary authority however did not accept the aforesaid findings of the enquiry officer.