ASHIS KUMAR MAITY Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The nine petitioners in this Article 226 petition dated April 23, 2010 are seeking the following principal relief:-

(2.) The petitioners claiming to be the heirs and legal representatives of one Ajodhya Nath Maity submitted a representation dated August 14, 2006 describing it as:-

(3.) There is nothing to support the petitioners' claim that their deceased mother was the consumer of the supply through the Meter No.3709498. On the contrary, CESC has produced a departmental letter dated September 10, 2010 clearly recording therein that Shanti is the recorded consumer of the supply. Admittedly, neither the petitioners are nor was their deceased mother the consumer of the supply through the other meter.