SOHAN PRASAD CHOUDHARY Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A Councillor of Bhatpara Municipality has petitioned for interference, to declare notice dated 30th December, 2019 as issued in violation of the Rules and, therefore, bad. The facts are, requisition dated 6th December, 2019 was duly made for removal of present Chairman of the Municipality. The requisition was received on the day itself. On 20th December, 2019, the Chairman issued meeting notice on the item of business of his removal. The meeting would be a special meeting of Councillors of Bhatpara Municipality, to be held on 20th January, 2020 at 1.00 PM. The Vice-Chairman of the Municipality by letter dated 26th December, 2019 addressed to Principal Secretary of concerned department in Government of West Bengal said, inter alia, as follows :-

(2.) On 28th December, 2019 some Councillors wrote to said Principal Secretary contending that the Vice-Chairman had made a thinly veiled attempt to usurp the powers of the Chairman, in colourable exercise of authority. On 30th December, 2019 three other Councillors issued impugned notice convening meeting on the agenda, to be held today at 10:30 AM.

(3.) Mr. Bhattacharya, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and moves the petition as 'unlisted motion' on leave obtained. He submits, rule 9 in West Bengal Municipalities (Procedure and Conduct of Business) Rules, 1995 provides for prescribed procedure, mandated by West Bengal Municipal Act, 1993. The Chairman, on receipt of the requisition, convened meeting within 15 days thereof. He relies on view expressed by a learned single Judge of this Court by order dated 31st August, 2016, in AST 269 of 2016 [Mahendra Kumar Rungta vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.] to submit, in similar fact situation said learned Judge had set aside subsequent notice of meeting issued by Councillors of concerned Municipality. He submits further, there is no challenge to the notice of meeting issued by the Chairman.