HARUN ALI MALLICK Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The petitioner in this Art. 226 petition dated July 9, 2010 is questioning the order of the Additional District Magistrate (Dev.), Hooghly dated November 13, 2009 (at p. 33) under S. 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

(2.) The order was made on the basis of a S. 14 application dated April 7, 2009 filed by the Divisional Manager, Canara Bank, Small & Medium Enterprises Branch, Kolkata. The relevant part of the order is quoted below:

(3.) It is evident from the order that the petitioner was named therein as one of the three borrowers, and that a copy of the order was forwarded to him by a memo dated November 13, 2009. It is also evident that the borrowers named in the order had been served with notice of the application and were heard by the Additional District Magistrate (Dev.), Hooghly.