PAMELA SARKAR Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have considered the submission as pointed out by Mr. Bagchi, learned Counsel for the opposite party No.2, as well as Mr. Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) Mr. Singh has taken a plea that earlier an application was filed by MR. Bagchi's client under section 438 of the Cr. PC and the same was rejected as not pressed and subsequent thereto, another application for anticipatory bail was filed by the opposite party No.2 suppressing the materials fact before the learned Trial Court.

(3.) We also accept the contention made on behalf of the petitioner for cancellation of bail on the ground of suppression of material facts from the Court.