BIDHU BHUSAN DAS Vs. USHA RANI KAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record.

(2.) From the affidavit of service it appears that service of notice has duly been effected upon the opposite party No. 1. But as regards the service of notice upon the opposite party No. 2 it appears that acknowledgement due card has not yet been received. Notice was sent on February 22,2007. So, it can well be presumed that notice has been duly served upon the heirs of the original defendants.

(3.) Being aggrieved by the said order, the plaintiff-petitioner has come up with this application.