REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

SUPRATIK GHOSH Appellant

V/S

PASARI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PVT.LTD Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

CHUCK V. CREMER [REFERRED TO]
VITARELLI V. SEATON [REFERRED TO]
NANCOWRY TRADING CO. V. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
OFFICIAL TRUSTEE WEST BENGAL VS. SACHINDRA NATH CHATTERJEE [REFERRED TO]
M L SETHI VS. R P KAPUR [REFERRED TO]
SHER SINGH VS. JOINT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. R S NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
PROVASH CHANDRA DALUI VS. BISWANATH BANERJEE [REFERRED TO]
S N MUKHERJEE VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SHIV KUMAR CHADHA / D.M.SAWHNEY / D.R.CHAWLA VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI [REFERRED TO]
MORGAN STANLEY MUTUAL FUND DRARVINDGUPTA VS. KARTICK DAS:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED VS. NEPC INDIA LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
NEPC MECON LIMITED VS. MAGMA LEASING LIMITED [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) On the joint prayer of both the parties the appeal and the application for stay have been heard together.

(2.) This appeal is arising out of an order No. 2 dated 22.9.1999 passed by Shri P.S. Dutta, learned District Judge-in-Charge, Alipure in Title Suit No. 132 of 1999, in connection with Ptn. No. ED-5585/99, granting an interim order of injunction as prayed for till 11.1.2000 on the condition that the plaintiff/respondents should comply with the provisions of Clauses (a) and (b) of the proviso to Rule 3 of order 39 of CPC.

(3.) The respondents, in Title Suit No. 132 of 1999 preferred an application under section 9 of the Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1996). In the said application the respondents prayed for the following reliefs:

Click here to view full judgment.

SUPRATIK GHOSH Vs. PASARI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address