NAMITA PAUL Vs. STATE OF TRIPURA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Petitioner seeks arrears of pay and allowances and other benefits w.e.f. 27.12.2010 notionally fixing her pay in the scale of Rs.4530-13000/- with the pay band-1 and Grade pay of Rs.1200 w.e.f. 01.07.2008. Petitioner claims that her case is identical to one decided by learned Single Judge of this Court dated 29.06.2015 in WP(C) No.505 of 2011 in case of Sri Pradipta Kumar Goswami & others v. The Government of Tripura & others. The petitioner would point out that in a subsequent decision dated 04.01.2019 in WP(C) No.89 of 2018 and connected petitions in case of Sri Biswajit Bhowmik v. The State of Tripura & others, similar view was taken by the learned Single Judge. Counsel for the Tripura State Electricity Corporation does not dispute these averments of the petitioner of her case being identical to the above mentioned two decided cases. Relevant portion of the decision in case of Pradipta Kumar Goswami may be noted:

(2.) The case of the petitioner would be covered by the same directions, particularly those mentioned in paragraph-12 and will apply mutatis mutandis to the present petitioner and her pay and allowances shall be fixed accordingly.

(3.) With these directions, the petition is disposed of.