SHYAMAL Vs. STATE OF TRIPURA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is another unfortunate case where a trial in a murder case has been stalled for more than four years due to interim orders granted by this Court.

(2.) BRIEFLY stated, the facts of the case are that a complaint was registered at the instance of one Smti. Tinku Roy alias Chumki Roy, W/O. Late Arjun Roy in which she alleged that the petitioner/accused had called her husband on 10 -04 -2005. Her husband was working as a driver with the petitioner/accused. When her husband did not return back, she along with her brothers visited the complainant but he gave no proper answer. Finally, they read a news item in a newspaper on 19 -04 -2005 that an unknown dead body had been recovered from the Gomti river at Sonamura. Thereafter, the complaint was filed and it was alleged in the complaint that the complainant suspected that her husband had been murdered by the petitioner herein.

(3.) I am indeed shocked that only on the ground of territorial jurisdiction a sessions trial should be delayed for such a long period. The murder could have taken place in any of the two jurisdictions. The deceased was taken away from Udaipur. The petitioner claimed that the trial should be held either at Udaipur or at Sonamura but not at Belonia. The FIR was lodged at Santirbazaar which falls within the jurisdiction of Belonia and according to the complainant, her husband was taken away from Belonia. Therefore, it cannot be said that the Courts at Belonia have no jurisdiction in the matter.