(1.) Heard Mr. C.S. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also heard Mr. N. Majumder, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
(2.) By means of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the corrigendum dated 30th April, 2016 and for setting aside down-grading of ACR from 'very good' to 'Average'.
(3.) Brief facts of the case are as under: