LAWS(MPH)-2009-3-49

SHEEL CHAND JAIN Vs. STATE OF M P

Decided On March 15, 2009
SHEEL CHAND JAIN Appellant
V/S
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Division Bench has made the reference to the Larger Bench opining that Rule 3 (6) of M.P. Swatantrata Sangram Sainik Samman Nidhi Niyam, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") requires to be read down so as to make it a valid piece of legislation.

(2.) RULE 3 (6) of the RULEs provides as under:-

(3.) WE have heard Shri R.K.Samaiya, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Shri Prashant Singh, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State.