(1.) The appeal has been preferred by the insurer assailing the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal, whereas claimants have come up in the cross-objections for enhancement of compensation.
(2.) Deceased Maheshchand Dinkar was a Patwari aged 35 years. He was working in the Revenue Department of State of M.P. He was earning emoluments at Rs. 5,734/- per month. However, considering the future prospects of promotion etc. the Tribunal assessed the income of the deceased at Rs. 7,000/- per month i.e. Rs. 84,000/- per annum and deducting ?rd towards self expenses, the loss of dependency was calculated at Rs. 56,000/- per annum and applying the multiplier of 17 and granting an amount of Rs. 10,000/- towards various customary heads the total compensation of Rs. 9,62,000/- has been awarded.
(3.) Dissatisfied thereby, the appeal has been preferred by the insurer. The claimants have come up by way of filing cross-objections for enhancing the compensation on the ground that deceased had six dependents on his earning consequently th of the income of deceased could have been deducted towards self-expenses of the deceased instead of ?rd amount deducted by the Tribunal.